Hi Z,

I also don't really think that Amarel is 'the fat man' however I do see a similarity. He has however broken his professional code of conduct by writing a book with his version of what he claims is evidence using information he thinks he found out while doing his job. It would be the same as if your doctor wrote a book about you, giving out your private information, that is his interpretation of it, in your name just to make a buck! Madeleine's parents are innocent and have not been proven guilty. Due to my own intuitionally received information I know that Madeleien was abducted, that there are several people involved and that they may have had differet agendas with Madeleine. Madeleine's parents did not neglect Madeleine, rather they wanted to keep their children in a routine they were happy with and not force them to sit up tired and crying during the adult's evening time. They were completely sure that the children were alright and just checked on them the same way parents check on their sleeping youngsters at home. They felt so safe that it never occurred to them that their child would be abducted, that was a mistake but Madeleien could just as easy have been abducted at home if they were dining out in the garden and her bedroom was at the opposite site of the house.

To suggest in the male dominated portoguese society that Portugal is a family friendly place really depends on what you mean by family. You might find it generally means that women and children have to do what the men want and if they do there is peace. If not, if a mother wants to look after her childs needs and the father wants to dominate there will not be peace. Such a society is full of mysogyny. An educated and intelligent woman like Madeleines mother would be a challenge to the misogynyst fragile egos of certain portoguese men and Amarel fits the bill. He broke his code of conduct while eating lunch, speaking about and spreading his lies about the so called secret case in a public place. His wife verbally attacked Kate McCann comparing their difficulties on account of Amarel, through his own actions, losing his job, with the infinitely more devastating tragedy that has befallen the McCanns. There is no evidence to say that Madeleine is dead and the search for Madeleine must go on. That costs money and I hope that her devoted parents get all the financial help they need. They deserve it and their suffering and their work has already put laws into place that have made life more secure for children. Personally I don't believe in the conspiracy theory but I am sure there are several people involved in her abduction.  I wish you goodnight, Z, you certainly wrote down many ideas, and put in a lot of work, Grace

grace

It seems abductors take children even when parents are so near to them, like the case of 6 year old German boy, Renè Hasèe, that disappeared from the Amoreira beach near Aljezur in Portugal, on June 19 1996, while only walking just a few meters ahead of his parents. Some other kids are just bundled into a vehicle & whisked off & happens all over the world.

They may not all be snatched for peodofile reasons, but I am wondering if it could perhaps be desperate adoption agencies trying to meet their clients requirements with finding a match to suit their requests, that has people out on the streets taking the children.
Apart from the children unwanted at birth that would be officially registered, & abandoned kids, where do all the children come from that adoption agencies provide anyway?

It apparently costs thousands to adopt children & it’s probably expensive to have IVF treatment, so there must surely be some dodgy adoption agencies all over the world that perhaps sell children off cheaper, to people that cannot afford the official adoption procedure.
I believe the official way is a long drawn out process with having to provide details necessary for legal reasons, background checks, many rules & regulations, etc, so perhaps not everyone are able to adopt & turn to the unofficial way of adoption.
And it could be these adoption agencies that need to be looked into further?

It seems that many child institutions/orphanages are run by the Church, convents, monastries, Red Cross, etc & I’m wondering if Brian drawing religious crosses & medical crosses is something to do with it. 
Brian also said that “WS, runs a child network”.
Carol Everett had mentioned a dodgy orphanage in her insights too. Unorthodox things going on, I think she said.

Interesting reading Wikipedia on adoption - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adoption
“Private Domestic Adoption accounts for a significant portion of all adoptions; in the United States, for example, nearly 45% of adoptions are estimated to have occurred through private arrangements.”
That’s a high percentage done privately.

That made me think of Brian’s DDs on Joana Cipriano, where he says clients are American, New York -  “Fargo (Faro) Airport to Moscow Airport -- clients are American, New York -- H.S., Go to Russia Hotel Winst”
Brian saying ‘clients’,  may not be the person adopting, but perhaps the adoption agency.

There had been mention of the mother Leonor, wanting Joana to be sold off (but that may have been just the media etc).  And remember that Brian seems to think that that Joana’s case is linked to the Madeleine case.
Not that I think at all, that the McCann’s wanted Madeleine sold off, but there maybe people out on the streets snatching children to provide some private dodgy agencies.

I’m wondering, why wouldn’t the person adopting have a child from new born? And the only thing I can think of, at the moment, is that a lot of women for many years now, are more into their careers & can leave it too late to start a family themselves and/or find out that they cant have children anyway. So once they get towards 35-40yrs old, perhaps is easier for them to take on a 2, 3, 4, 5yr old & the women having been working, along with the husband, can afford to adopt.

A couple of other points I picked out from the above Wikipedia link on adoption :

In Egypt & under Muslim law adoption is illegal. So would they source from outside, taking in abducted children? I questioned how they would register a child, but I’ve been told that if you have the money, one can buy anything in some Muslim countries, including forged certificates, etc.
This may account for the search for Madeleine in Morocco & I think it was the U.S. psychics on the Haunting Evidence 5-part video that said that the abductor looked Egyptian.

LGBT (Lesbian Gay Bisexual Trangender) adoption is now legal in many countries, so there surely must be more call for children.

So it could be that adoption agencies need more children to sell, as they have a lot more on order & some of these agencies may be dodgy, arranging abductions & paying the abductor, then the agency sells at a much higher cost.

Above doesn’t really help with finding Madeleine, but could be a start with knowing who may be responsible. That would involve a lot of researching!

Brian has said that something went wrong after Madeleine was taken & that she was brought back - probably because of the media hype & the clients refused to take her. So perhaps in that case the media helped.

I listened again to psychic Zac speaking on Brian’s video clip of 14-12-09 - Did you notice that Zac mentioned that there are 3 high officials etc involved in the Madeleine case?

With my Google Alert for Madeleine, today this link came in, mentioning, politicians, “ ‘Face Oculta’ (major corruption scandal presently being investigated in Portugal) ” & wondered if there was any connection somehow -  http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/12/locards-truth-preface-to-english-gag.html

At the bottom of the page, on this link:   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Crime_in_Portugal

it explains ‘Face Oculta’  - clicking on different names etc was interesting to see who was involved

then under ‘Crime in Portugal’  -  Re Algarve  …”There are no reports of organized crime or gangs”…  …”growing number of cases related with drug trafficking”…

Brian says that there is drug trafficking possibly through the tunnels of Praia da Luz, as well as human trafficking.

Info also on Casa Pia, Joana Cipriano, Madeleine too, on that Wikipedia link

Z

Back to the bald black man, mentioned under this topic area.

More pics of him on below link (click on the multi-pic to enlarge) – has the same, sunglasses, shaped head, upper arm/elbow area, protruding stomach, as the man watching Gerry playing with the children.
This writer explains how this bald black man cannot be Raj Balu(s) who was a tourist on holiday.
http://thentherewere4-mccannunravelled.blogspot.com/2010/01/when-things-were-not-as-they-first.html

Z

hi z, maybe the three officials are luis, carlos and ricardo?

CL